Home for Old Hags

Struck by arthritis and its attendant mobility issues, the most worrisome being an increased risk of falling while walking in the forest or on her way down to the water, it hit her: her life would be shorter than most because she’d rather kill herself than live in a so-called retirement village.

It was bad enough to live in a regular neighborhood.  She’d been called a cunt and a bitch.  She’d been dismissed and patronized.  She’d been treated like a teenager because she wasn’t married with kids.  She’d been treated like an outsider, never invited over, because she was solo.

Then one day, after she’d watched Quartet, about a home for old musicians, she thought yeah, maybe, if she could find a home for old academics and artists … aha!  A home for old feminists!

She spent a day figuring out how to tap into crowd funding.

Almost immediately, a few women with business experience stepped forward.  Lunged forward, actually.  Leapt into the air and somersaulted before landing.

They discussed ideas, options, plans, then settled on the perfect location.  And found it.  A large flat acreage, on a small lake, with a woodsy area out back.

Then started hiring.  Landscapers, architects, carpenters, electricians, plumbers … All women.  And all had read Perez.  Many times.  So the apartments were built for people who were, on average, 5’2″.  Counter heights, cupboard heights, cupboard depths …

And for people who were, on average, 75 years of age.  Grab bars, step-in tubs …

One- and two-bedroom apartments.  Some with private kitchens.  A communal kitchen for those without.

A couple cafes for those who were used to living in the city.  Though many of them were now craving quiet and solitude.  And those who had lived with quiet and solitude craved companionship every now and then.

A library.  A movie room.

They bought a pontoon boat that seated six, as well as a few kayaks for those still able.

Several paths were established through the woods, one paved for those on chairs, one with a handrail from tree to tree, for the visually-challenged and balance-challenged, both with benches for resting along the way…

They advertised for maintenance staff, administrative staff, nursing staff, kitchen staff, drivers, general assistants.  And were flooded with applications.  All women, all ages, all wanting to work in a place where they’d never see a man, never have to deal with a man.

And more, all fully aware of the benefits of interacting with old feminists.  Women who had been on the fronts, literally, of getting access to contraception, and abortion, and bank accounts, and driver’s licences, and deeds to land … and not needing your husband’s permission, for anything …

Some of the young women were startled.  You couldn’t own property?  Why not?  You couldn’t even apply to go to Harvard—until 1999?  Are you fucking kidding me?

The old women sighed.  What are they teaching you these days?

What they themselves had been taught, they realized.  Men’s history.  Only men’s history.   Always men’s history.

A few men applied, but they almost always hired a woman.  Because, funny thing, the best applicant was always a woman.

The first time they had to hire a man, they—well, they could fill a book with what they might’ve said to him.  In fact, a few of them had.  Which was why they were silent now.  Why their eyes just sort of glazed over now.  Why they just ignored him now.  Completely.

He couldn’t handle it.  The lack of attention.  It was like he didn’t matter.  At all.  And he couldn’t bear it.  He left.

And they looked at each other.  Stunned.  Busily rewriting their pasts.

No, someone finally spoke up.  The one first to reach the end of that alternate universe.  They were killing us.  We couldn’t’ve just ignored them.

Nods.  All round.

And then sighs.

The second time they hired a man, several of the women hid his tools.  Several times.  They failed to give him clear instructions.  It took him a whole week for a two-day job.   They pointed this out to him, then paid him 77 cents on the dollar.

Enraged, he spread the word.

They cheered.

Soon another Home opened.  And another.  Their landscapers, carpenters, plumbers, and electricians had to hire apprentices.  And found them.  Easily.

Administrative, health, and food services had long dominated by women, so there were no staffing problems there.

Of course many of the residents weren’t quite ready to give up.  To give it up.  They found that after a year of respite?  refreshment? they were ready to resume their political activism.

Women had always been good at organizing.  Which was why management dominated by men had been such a disaster.  It was women who kept track of the kids’ field trips, and dentist appointments, and doctors’ appointments, and music lessons, and after-school practices.  Women even kept their bosses organized.  Acknowledgement of which would have most certainly challenged the power structure.  Nine to Five was one of the more popular movies in their collection.

And so.  Bag ladies became bomb squads.  Sports stadiums were their first targets.  Because really, 5 billion dollars to build a place for adult males to play with balls in public?  Boys will be boys, well into adulthood if they are not stopped and reprimanded for their immaturity.

How many hospitals and schools could be built with the money?  How many doctors and teachers could be hired?  And paid commensurate to their value?

Blackmail became rampant.  It’s amazing how much an old woman fussing in the corner of a room can record.  Private offices, executive suites, boardrooms, hotel lobbies.

Contraception and abortion became available again.  Money was found to process the thousands of rape kits just sitting in evidence lockers.  Judges were appointed to hear the appeals of the many women incarcerated for, essentially, self-defence.  So many decisions were reversed for no apparent a reason.  So many orders countermanded.

from No Logo, Naomi Klein

“… many of today’s best-known manufacturers no longer produce products and advertise them, but rather buy products and ‘brand’ them …” p5

“[T]his corporate obsession with brand identity is waging a war on public and individual space; on public institutions such as schools, on youthful identities, on the concept of nationality, and on the possibilities for unmarketed space.” p5

“[M]edia and retail companies have inflated to such bloated proportions that simple decisions about what items to stock in a store or what kind of cultural product to commission … now have enormous consequences; those who make these choices have the power to reengineer the cultural landscape.” p165

“Streets are public spaces, adbusters argue, and since most residents can’t afford to counter corporate messages by purchasing their own ads, they should have the right to talk back to images they never asked to see.” p280

“The earth is not dying, it is being killed.  And those that are killing it have names and addresses.”  Utah Phillips (quoted by Klein on p325)

“… contest the authority of corporations to govern” p325  (Indeed.  They weren’t elected.)

“… children in Indonesia and China [are] working in virtual slavery ‘so that children in America can put frilly dresses on America’s favorite doll'” p328

“If Wal-Mart [has] the power to lower prices, alter CD covers, and influence magazine content, [does] it not also have the power to demand and enforce ethical labor standards from its suppliers?” p239

“Disney CEO Michael Eisner earns $9,783 an hour while a Haitian worker ears 28 cents an hou; it would take a Haitian worker 16.8 years to earn Eisner’s hourly income; the $181 million in stock options Eisner exercised in 1996 is enough to take care of his 19,000 Haitian workers and their families for fourteen years.” p352

“Please use your liberty to promote ours.” Aung San Suu Kyi (quoted by Klein on p403)

Janelle Shane’s You Look Like a Thing and I Love You

a few bits from Janelle Shane’s You Look Like a Thing and I Love You

“Researchers have discovered that something as seemingly insignificant a a small sticker can make an image recognition AI think a gun is a toaster …” p4

And vice versa, I presume.  Well, that’s not alarming at all.

“A team at Stanford University once trained an AI to tell the difference between pictures of healthy skin and pictures of skin cancer.  After the researchers trained their AI, however, they discovered that they had inadvertently trained [it to be] a ruler detector instead—many of the tumors in their training data had been photographed next to rulers for scale.” p23

So when your GP asks your permission to use AI assistance … just say no.

“If you give a job-candidate-screening AI biased data to learn from (which you almost certainly did, unless you did a lot of work to scrub bias from the data), then you also give it a convenient shortcut to improve its accuracy at predicting the ‘best’ candidate: prefer white men.” p26-27

Yeah.  Garbage in, garbage out.

“AI has the approximate brainpower of a worm.”

“AI does not really understand the problem you want it to solve.”

“AI will take the path of least resistance.”

 

 

 

“What Does it Mean to Work Under Algorithmic Eyes?”

“We should not take computer scientists at their word that the paradigms for human emotions they have developed… can produce ground truth about human emotions.”

Part of the reason is that machines are biased. Women, older employees, neurodiverse workers, and people of color are far more likely to be misread and mismeasured. What the algorithm flags as “disengagement” may simply be fatigue, cultural difference, or, god forbid, a moment of quiet reflection. Yet those misreadings can influence performance reviews, promotions, and layoffs.”

Yeah.  Computer scientists are in waaaaay over their heads on most AI applications.

Suppose that worldwide …

Suppose that worldwide, women flood the military, soon comprising, say, 40% of the ranks (which will be perceived by men as a majority) (go figure).

Suppose then, as happened when women flooded the ranks of bank tellers, secretaries, and teachers, being a soldier became devalued, losing its prestige, its glory, its funding, its media coverage.

And when being a soldier has about as much appeal as being a waitress … the end of war?

some funny bits from Tim Dorsey’s The Maltese Iguana

“I don’t need to read anything to know what I’m talking about!” / “In one sentence you’ve just summed up everything wrong wtih our country today!”  p152

“A few short years ago, we could look at a drinking glass and agree it was filled to the midpoint with water, then argue about what it meant.  But today?  Good lord!  We all look at the same glass now, and it’s either A: half-full, or B: a squirrel.”  p153

“Entertainment,” said a smiling Serge.  “I love watching when assholes hit a wall.  their brains aren’t wired for anything that can’t be solved with shittiness.”  p214

“After all, a woman was being savagely attacked …  Something needed to be done.  So everyone swung into action and turned on their cell phone cameras.”  p226

“So,” said Serge.  “What do you like in a man?” / “Absence.”  p260

 

Suppose two married women …

Suppose two married women get jobs outside the home at the same time, forcing their husbands to hire someone to do the cooking, cleaning, and childcare.  Ten hours/day, 5 days/week, at $20/hr.  It’s a lot to afford, but the men have so-called ‘breadwinner’ salaries.

Suppose it turns out that Emma is hired by Alyssa’s husband (on Alyssa’s recommendation) and Alyssa is hired by Emma’s husband (on Emma’s recommendation).

And they’re both really enjoying their evenings off and their $52,000/yr incomes.

Who’s ethically responsible for an AI’s behavior?

Excellent question.  One I’ve thought about (as a philosopher and an ex-ethics consultant) and raised here.

One might suggest that an AI is like a gun, and ‘we’ve’ always argued that those who create guns and bombs should not be held responsible for how they’re used.  Not sure about that, but regardless, an important difference is that a bomb doesn’t have agency.  Well, I guess not until now.

So it’s more like the issue of whether we should hold parents responsible for their kid’s behaviour.

I’m leaning toward yes.  Especially since most people, and AI techies, create children and AI agents without having any qualifications whatsoever regarding child or AI development, and that includes MORAL development.

 

 

Suppose by some biochemical quirk …

Suppose by some biochemical quirk, the hormones we’ve been feeding cows inhibits testosterone in humans, so the more meat men eat, the weaker they become.

Suppose that within a year, males lost their 30% physical strength advantage over women.

What would happen?

Naomi Alderman’s The Power meets Monty Python’s “Hell’s Grannies”

A man struts and huffs and puffs and expands like a blowfish, but all the old women close their eyes. Deny him the female gaze. Refuse to be a witness to his Almighty Greatness, let alone a cheerleader.

And not only does he deflate, he disappears in a puff of, well, nothingness. Existential nothingness. Beauvoir would be delighted.

Camus would be pissed though.

Cool. So … very cool.

Yeah, it’s not that we’ve stopped reflecting men at twice their size, thank you Dale Spender and Sally Cline; we’ve stopped reflecting them at all.

*

She kills him.

WTF!

He consented. She paused. Did anyone hear him say ‘No’?

Next time she drugs him. Then kills him.

WTF!

He consented. She poked at his inert body. He didn’t resist.

Next time, she asks him. I’d really like to kill you.

What?

Do you consent?

What?

She looks at the others. I swear half of them are too stupid to live.

She shoots him.

WTF!

Relax, no one saw me. I’m an old woman. Invisible.

Unfuckable.

Same thing.

Yeah.